The NIFL Computer Generated Power Poll & Strength of Schedule
For 2003, the formula has been tweaked a little from last year. It still takes into account each team's winning percentage, the winning percentages of that team's opponents and the winning percentages of the opponents of that team's opponents. But this year I've also added a scoring multiplier based on the difference between points scored and points allowed. Basically, teams are rewarded for blowing out their opponents and penalized for getting blownout.
Revised 06/16/03
|
CPR
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOS
|
|
Ranking
|
Team
|
Power Rating
|
|
|
Ranking
|
Team
|
Rank
|
1
|
Ohio Valley (11-0)
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
1
|
Billings
|
8.45
|
2
|
Lake Charles (10-2)
|
12.66
|
|
|
|
2
|
Evansville
|
8.41
|
3
|
FortWayne (7-4)
|
10.30
|
|
|
|
3
|
Tupelo
|
8.30
|
4
|
Omaha (9-3)
|
9.33
|
|
|
|
4
|
Utah
|
8.24
|
5
|
Lexington (8-3)
|
9.04
|
|
|
|
5
|
Myrtle Beach
|
8.07
|
6
|
Utah (8-3)
|
8.93
|
|
|
|
6
|
Sioux Falls
|
8.05
|
7
|
Houma (9-4)
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
7
|
Wyoming
|
8.03
|
8
|
Sioux Falls (8-4)
|
7.83
|
|
|
|
8
|
Show Me
|
7.83
|
9
|
Bismarck (8-4)
|
7.81
|
|
|
|
9
|
Tennessee
|
7.81
|
10
|
Lincoln (7-5)
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
10
|
Oklahoma
|
7.78
|
11
|
Billings (6-7)
|
6.91
|
|
|
|
11
|
Bismarck
|
7.76
|
12
|
Rapid City (7-6)
|
6.72
|
|
|
|
12
|
Rapid City
|
7.76
|
13
|
Austin (6-6)
|
5.94
|
|
|
|
13
|
LaCrosse
|
7.33
|
14
|
Sioux City (6-6)
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
14
|
FortWayne
|
7.14
|
15
|
Beaumont (6-6)
|
5.11
|
|
|
|
15
|
Tri City
|
7.11
|
16
|
Tennessee (5-6)
|
5.09
|
|
|
|
16
|
Sioux City
|
6.99
|
17
|
Show Me (4-8)
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
17
|
Lincoln
|
6.95
|
18
|
Wyoming (4-8)
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
18
|
Austin
|
6.96
|
19
|
Myrtle Beach (4-7)
|
4.62
|
|
|
|
19
|
Houma
|
6.93
|
20
|
LaCrosse (4-9)
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
20
|
Lake Charles
|
6.89
|
21
|
Tri City (3-10)
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
21
|
Beaumont
|
6.86
|
22
|
Evansville (0-12)
|
3.06
|
|
|
|
22
|
Omaha
|
6.54
|
23
|
Oklahoma (2-10)
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
23
|
Lexington
|
6.48
|
24
|
Tupelo (1-10)
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
24
|
Ohio Valley
|
6.33
|
The opinions expressed in articles or commentaries on nationalindoorfootballleague.net are only those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the thoughts, opinions, or official stance of the National Indoor Football League, it's member teams or staff. Please refer to the privacy and legal section for more information
|
|