The NIFL Computer Generated Power Poll
As of games played through April 14th
For 2003, the formula has been tweaked a little from last year. It still takes into account each team's winning percentage, the winning percentages of that team's opponents and the winning percentages of the opponents of that team's opponents. But this year I've also added a scoring multiplier based on the difference between points scored and points allowed. Basically, teams are rewarded for blowing out their opponents and penalized for getting blownout.
|
Ranking
|
Team
|
Power Rating
|
|
1
|
Ohio Valley (3-0)
|
14.83
|
|
2
|
Lake Charles (4-0)
|
12.81
|
|
3
|
Utah (3-0)
|
11.39
|
|
4
|
Beaumont (4-0)
|
10.93
|
|
5
|
Sioux Falls (3-1)
|
8.98
|
|
6
|
Omaha (2-1)
|
7.70
|
|
7
|
FortWayne (2-1)
|
7.57
|
|
8
|
LaCrosse (2-2)
|
7.39
|
|
9
|
Sioux City (3-1)
|
7.33
|
|
10
|
Rapid City (3-2)
|
6.87
|
|
11
|
Lexington (1-1)
|
6.87
|
|
12
|
Billings (1-3)
|
6.55
|
|
13
|
Tri City (2-2)
|
6.50
|
|
14
|
Houma (2-2)
|
6.16
|
|
15
|
Wyoming (2-2)
|
6.09
|
|
16
|
Show Me (1-2)
|
5.02
|
|
17
|
Austin (1-2)
|
4.58
|
|
18
|
Lincoln (1-3)
|
4.47
|
|
19
|
Tennessee (1-2)
|
4.25
|
|
20
|
Myrtle Beach (1-2)
|
4.22
|
|
21
|
Bismarck (1-3)
|
3.57
|
|
22
|
Evansville (0-4)
|
3.11
|
|
23
|
Oklahoma (0-3)
|
2.86
|
|
24
|
Tupelo (0-4)
|
2.18
|
The opinions expressed in articles or commentaries on nationalindoorfootballleague.net are only those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the thoughts, opinions, or official stance of the National Indoor Football League, it's member teams or staff. Please refer to the privacy and legal section for more information
|
|
